Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Open Enrollment letter to HSD

From the Center on Law and Poverty:

Morning All,
 
With all of the misinformation that’s been floating around surrounding the Oct. 1st date and what will happen to applications, the Center wrote a letter to HSD outlining their responsibilities under federal regulations and asking for some specific actions to be taken. I’ve attached it to this email. Hopefully it will help shed some light on how this process is supposed to roll out (now whether or not HSD will comply is another question). Feel free to disseminate and let me know if you have any questions about it!
 
Thanks,
 
Dorianne
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Washington Post: "The White House says Obamacare begins on October 1. Not really"

 

by Sarah Kliff

Updated August 26, 2013

Days until marketplaces launch: 36.

Oct. 1 has become a pivotal date in the media coverage of the Affordable Care Act. It’s  the day, as any regular reader of this column knows, that the health insurance marketplaces open for business. It’s the day that I’m counting down to at the top of this column, and one that the White House says marks the start of Obamacare.
 
That’s one way to think about it. Here’s another: Oct. 1 is a completely arbitrary date, one that never shows up in the text of the Affordable Care Act and that has little bearing on the health law’s success or failure.

As I spent time reporting my most recent article – checking in with state marketplaces — it became increasingly clear that their big day isn’t necessarily Oct. 1. Instead, it’s Jan. 1,  the day that the individual mandate takes effect and any plans purchased on the marketplace actually kick in.

The space between October and December is viewed, by many standing up the health care law, as a soft launch: the time to make their new Web sites live, sort out the kinks and get the site in prime condition for the beginning of 2014.

The Affordable Care Act never set an open enrollment period. It directed the secretary of Health and Human Services to set “an initial open enrollment.” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’s agency set Oct. 1 through March 31 as the initial period when Americans purchase coverage.

Open enrollment begins in October, but any health insurance coverage sold on the marketplaces cannot take effect until Jan. 1, 2014. So, on the exchanges, there’s no difference in when you begin to receive coverage whether you buy it this Thanksgiving, Christmas or New Year’s Eve.

This is why states seem relatively okay with using the first few months of open enrollment as a test period: Even if there are kinks in October, they don’t expect it to hamper residents’ ability to purchase a plan by Dec. 31.

Oregon recently decided to open its marketplace only to registered brokers and community assisters on Oct. 1, waiting a few weeks until letting the general public in. Just how many weeks is still undecided.

“Even if we don’t go live in the third week or fourth week, that will still give people plenty of time to go on and find a plan,” says Amy Fauver, a spokeswoman for the exchange Cover Oregon.

Fauver says that the decision to delay public access to Cover Oregon wasn’t about capacity; the site could handle heavy traffic. Instead, the agency wanted to have a beta launch, giving a small group of users access first.

“When Google launched Gmail you had to be invited” Fauver says. “That was their beta launch. That was their way to identify bugs. Our benefit is that our initial users will be community partners who will be trained on the system.”

One big unknown for states is how many people will head to the marketplace during this soft launch phase. Numerous consumer marketing campaigns are underway, and there will no doubt be copious media coverage when the switch gets flipped on the first of October.

At the same time, there’s little financial incentive to buy coverage in October that won’t take effect in January. Some experts I’ve interviewed expect that there won’t be heavy take-up until January, or even March of next year, when the individual mandate is in effect and open enrollment nears its end. It’s hard to know because the country has never done something like this before.

Any kinks during the October soft launch will matter: These will the be first reports of how easy – or difficult – it is for consumers to purchase coverage under the new health care law. Will difficulties derail the entire law and its launch? In Oregon, among the states that have been most aggressive in setting up the health care law, they don’t think so.

I think about Oct. 1 as our first glimpse at Obamacare in action, which is why I’m keeping the countdown at the top of this column. But we won’t see Obamacare’s programs kick in or the version of the exchanges that most of the Americans gaining coverage will ultimately interact with until the beginning of the new year.

From the Medicaid Coalition



Medicaid Coalitionistas,

The LFC will hear the Medicaid budget on September 27th at 10 am.


Also, the Albuquerque Journal ran this story today on Centennial Care and Medicaid expansion:


See you all at our next meeting on September 11, 10 am, at the SWLC.

Thanks,
Bill

How American Indians Benefit from the Affordable Care Act Takes Center Stage



TRAVERSE CITY, MICHIGAN – Some 400 American Indian tribal leaders and health care professionals are meeting at the Grand Traverse Resort and Spa, owned by the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, at the National Indian Health Board's 30th Annual Conference.

"We are delighted to have nearly 400 tribal leaders, elders and health care colleagues engaged in the current health care reform issues that impact every single person in our families and communities. From the American Indian and Alaska Native benefits through the Affordable Care Act to the renewal of the Special Diabetes Program for Indians. It is important to be involved and informed on the policies that are improving health care services and accessibility to our tribal members,"
said NIHB Chairperson Cathy Abramson.
"We are pleased to have a number of federal agency representatives here today to provide this information, to answer our questions and to listen to our comments and concerns."
On Tuesday, conference attendees heard from federal agencies that seek to improve health conditions in Indian country.
Indian Health Service
Dr. Yvette Roubideaux, acting director of the Indian Health Service, who provided an overview of the Affordable Care Act, leading up to the to the October 1st enrollment of the Insurance Marketplace of the Act.
"Meeting with tribes and tribal organizations, such as the NIHB, is a very important part of our agency consultation efforts and IHS's priority to renew and strengthen our partnership with Tribes. We value our partnership with NIHB as we work together to change and improve the IHS and to eliminate health disparities in Indian country,"
Dr. Roubideaux said.
Department of Veterans Affairs
The Department of Veterans Affairs partnered with NIHB to host the second Native veterans' health workshop track at this year's conference.
"We are committed to nurturing an environment that fosters trust and provides culturally competent care for Native American veterans, including creating culturally sensitive outreach materials, incorporating traditional practices and rituals into treatment and ensuring the best possible experience when Native American veterans receive care from the VA,"
said John Garcia, Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs at the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
"We at the VA are further committed to working with and for tribal leaders on a nation-to-nation basis to address the many issues being experienced by veterans and their families across Indian country."
Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services
Mary Wakefield, Administrator for the Health Resources and Services Administration said that under the leadership of the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, one of the top goals is to improve health equity with Indian tribes.
Levi Rickert, editor-in-chief in Native Health


"We want to eliminate health disparities among American Indians and Alaska Natives. And, we believe we can do that by working toward two other goals - to strengthen the health workforce by expanding the supply of culturally competent primary health care providers in Indian country and Alaska and to improve access to quality health care and services by increasing the number of health care access points,"
Wakefield said.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Health and Human Services
Mirtha Beadle, Deputy Administrator for Operations with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration in HHS focused her speech on behavioral health issues stating that American Indian and Alaska Natives have the highest level of substance abuse and dependence and unmet need.
"The emphasis is growing on screening and early intervention services. Evidence based practices are an important shift for behavioral health. There is an increased need to focus on bilingual populations in the US. American Indians and Alaska Natives stand to benefit substantially from the implementation of the Affordable Care Act,"
Beadle added.
Office of Personnel Management
Susan McNally, Senior Advisor in the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) provided n brief overview of the health plans that OPM directs under the Affordable Care Act. OPM will work with private insurance to offer two state health plans – the Multi-State Plan and the Federal Employee Health Benefits program, which OPM has managed for nearly 40 years.
The 30th Annual Consumer Conference continues today with a keynote address from Gold Olympic Medalist Billy Mills, updates from the Tribal Leaders Diabetes Committees and the Tribal Technical Advisory Committee to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and a panel discussion on the definition of Indian in the Affordable Care Act.

“BREAKING BONDS” The Shutdown of New Mexico’s Behavioral Health Providers

“BREAKING BONDS”
The Shutdown of New Mexico’s
    Behavioral Health Providers
 
The program can be viewed on YouTube.  Simply paste this address  into your browser window and hit “send”. 


Following the results of a yet-to-be released audit, the State Human Services Division (NMHSD) has mandated cutting off Medicaid Behavioral Health funding to several agencies, alleging fraud and mismanagement. These agencies represent nearly 90% of the State's entire behavioral health services system.
 
The shutdown will potentially affect 30,000 clients and their families throughout New Mexico, thus further crippling an already fragile behavioral health network. The State has chosen to turn over much of the management of these providers to Arizona companies.

 
New Mexico has one of the highest rates of alcoholism and drug abuse, and is consistently a national leader in the number of suicides.
“BREAKING BONDS” focuses on the impact of terminating long-standing relationships between caregivers and vulnerable clients.  It is a centerpiece of the Coalition’s public awareness campaign that also features press releases, radio/TV and print interviews, a “call-in” allowing providers and families to state their concerns to government officials, a mass rally at the State Capitol on August 30, and TV spots.

KAISER Family Foundation "An Early look at Premiums and Insurer Participation in Heallth Insurance Marketplace, 2014







For more information or full report leave a comment or email this blog.









Advocate Comments on "No Wrong Door Policy" in NMHIX and Medicaid Expansion



Comments from Health Action NM:

  In a meeting today, Roxanne raised that Matt K has said that people applying for Medicaid Expansion before Jan 1 will get denial letters.  This is not what we've heard before and we all need to be stressing the seamless process for people.  If they get a denial letter, they will not be back!!  The suggestion is that we got to congressional delegation, tribes go to CMS and we get a written policy from HSD so we are all clear on this before outreach starts.  Of course, having health care guides inform and enroll on both should be the norm.  So everyone keep their ears up on this one and hammer away in public comment.  

Barbara
 
Comments from Disability rights NM:

Matt's statement is contrary to federal law, so it's disappointing that he's still saying it.   42 CFR 432.1205 says that during the open enrollment period from October 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013, the Medicaid agency has to accept applications (whether submitted directly or through the Exchange) and determine eligibility based on MAGI.  The preamble to the rule (issued July 15, 2013 in the Federal Register) noted concerns about people who become eligible for coverage effective January 2014 through the expansion being turned away and said that "individuals may not be required to return in January to reapply" (78 Fed. Reg. at 42178).

Closer to home, HSD's presentation to the LFC last week (PowerPoint attached) gives conflicting information.  It DOES say that people who apply before January 1 will be assessed for expansion eligibility and if found eligible, will be sent a letter notifying them they'll be covered as of January 1.  BUT it also says that people can apply starting January 1.  (See slides 16-17.)  I take this to mean that HSD will make no effort to inform people of the expansion option or encourage them to apply, but will comply with federal law as far as people who find their way in through no fault of HSD's.

        Ellen

Tribal Programs response to Streamline Application and Consultation session

GENERAL COMMENTS AND SPECIFIC STREAMLINE APPLICATION COMMENTS
By TRIBAL WORKGROUP
General comments on the streamlined application for Medicaid, Health Exchange (Marketplace), Medicare Savings Plan, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Cash Assistance and Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) based on the comments made by Native American  workgroup comprised of Kewa Pueblo Health Corporation, Santo Domingo, Zia and Acoma CHRs as a follow-up to the Tribal Consultation meeting held on August 29, 2013.   
  1. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires a simple and streamlined application for Insurance (Insurance Exchange/Marketplace) and Medicaid and CHIP.  The State of New Mexico is violating the ACA and all previous statements, planning information and documentation presented in tribal consultation presentations by announcing a Separate application for the Insurance Exchange or Marketplace. Under the ACA, an applicant need only apply once and eligibility for the Marketplace, Medicaid and CHIP will be determined.  States must provide one single application and have an interface between the two programs so that a person can apply for either one and get enrolled in the Right Coverage. The State has previously announced ‘no wrong door’ access to coverage and now we have opened up ‘another door’. The ACA envisions a method for an electronic match system to verify applicant records including the IRS.
The State is to meet the Eligibility process and all the requirements under 42 CFR 435, Subpart J for processing applications, determining and verifying eligibility and furnishing Medicaid.  An alternative application developed by the State should follow section 1413(b)(1)(B) of the ACA and approved by the Secretary which may be no more burdensome than the streamlined application developed by the Secretary. Our comments and recommendations below will expose the cumbersome and conflicting statements in the design of the State’s application.
  1. The State of New Mexico has ignored the Indian Protections in its Streamlined Application by not offering ‘choices’ and/or ‘options’ available to Native Americans under the ACA, IHCIA and acceptance in the implementation of the Indian provisions.  An example would be section 1932 of the Social Security Act which identifies requirements for Medicaid managed care plans to explain reasons for denying a request for a service or denying payment for a service already received and is to include information on beneficiary protections related to appealing a denial of coverage or payment. This application does not have such language, notice or description of such denials or appeals process. (rules on the content of written denial notice are in 42 CFR 438.404)
  2. Outreach and Enrollment is required under ACA to vulnerable and underserved populations who are eligible for Medicaid as a condition of federal funding. The State is to meet all the requirements of 42 CFR 435, Subpart M relative to the Coordination of eligibility and enrollment between Medicaid, CHIP, Exchanges and other insurance affordability programs. This requirement is not being met by the State. The State of New Mexico is working in silos with the Exchange and Medicaid enrollment with no communication and no Medicaid enrollment funding for those newly eligible for coverage and those living in rural areas and are of racial and ethnic minorities. As Essential Community Providers, the Indian Health and Tribal Health Centers should be PE determiners and NOT only Hospital based facilities. The identification of a Native American or “Indian” should be identified in the Application if the “Indian” is ‘Indian Health Service Enrolled’ at existing Indian Health Service or Tribal facilities.
  3. Identified ‘Indians’ have certain ‘Indian’ income which is NOT counted for Medicaid and CHIP eligibility including money from use of Indian land and trust rights and money from items of cultural and traditional value. The application makes not reference of opportunity to accommodate or include excluded income statements.
  4. All the ‘Assistance Programs’ as called in the Application should be designed as complete self-contained and stand-alone sections, color coded, with separate and distinct symbols and with self –controlling electronic edits in each mandatory field. There are no time dates for approvals by the various sub-agencies and tracking lists to be monitored by the applicant or advocate. This is an application for enrollment to become eligible for ‘Assistance Programs’ and not for confusing Enrollment advocates and applicants.  The application is to be simplified not 16 pages to confuse and frustrate applicants from enrolling.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Specific Streamline Application comments, suggestions and recommendations by sections as presented by the State of New Mexico:
Page 1- The statement is made that if an applicant does not qualify for Medicaid the application will automatically forwarded to the Exchange.  The Native American has a choice (not automatically enrolled) to enroll in the Exchange and this language and planned separate Exchange application will not be the correct statement nor action for this section. In Bold letters have this statement of Native American has options and are exempt from the individual mandate BEFORE getting started with the application.  
Recommend a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ box to allow for native to have an ‘option’ to enroll in Exchange.
Recommend symbols for each program, color coded, and electronic edits in each mandatory field with agency addresses or expected application approval time frames.
Section 2- Recommend simple language on ‘authorized representative or guardian’.  Also include a special section for Medicaid.  Not clear on what benefits/programs applicant is applying for.
Section 3- make Race and Ethnicity field mandatory and not optional. Include alien and immigrants. Combine last two columns on taxes as both are same question. Redo the entire statements at the bottom of grid as the language is confusing, not proper English, conflicting statements and do spell check.  Recommend an address or website to send information if you want to keep this verbiage.
Section 5- Define treatment facility- rehab, detox, institution-state hospital, Define PACE and under Other- include short term/long term facilities.
The question on ‘anyone receiving SSI’ the State should already know this based on existing State data base that should be shared among sub-agencies.
What is the legal purpose of ‘is anyone a victim of Family Violence’ question?
The question of ‘anyone in the household pregnant?  Who? Move this question to Section 9.
On the question of ‘how many babies expected from this pregnancy and due date ‘. Delete from application as 3 month retro coverage is in place.
On the question of ‘Name of Father of the unborn’?  Leave out in application and is requested in another section of application.
On the question of ‘Freedom of Choice for home and community based services waiver’?  Define and move to Nursing home section.
Section 6 – narrow the column on hours worked. Increase the ‘Income from’ column.  Under ‘other income’ section define and include exclusion of ‘Indian income NOT counted’ such as use of Indian land and trust rights, per cap, money from cultural and traditional value.  Where are the Indian protections noted in the application such as cost sharing exemptions, resource and estate recovery protections, managed care protections? How will ISD office know of such protections and how will such ISD staff be trained?
Section 7- Include a section to ‘income statements’ that can be made by Indian applicants declaring their income as some do not file taxes.
Section 8- This section has legal implications on allowing HSD rights to collect child support from absent parent. There is coordination needed between tribal courts and state courts on this section.
Section 9 – this is an Exchange question. Separate application and why? Move Section 5 to Section 9 and combine.
Section 11- Offer another  box for the Federally required ‘opt in ‘ option for Natives after changing the Application date to October 1, 2013 on top of this section and rewording and defining benefits and categories on the introductory language.  Another box for FFS as Natives can ‘opt in’ to both Medicaid and Exchange programs.
No need for a Stop Sign if you have self-contained and complete sections for each program.
Section 12 – this is same questions for QMB and institutional application.
Section 13- Define on top as introduction that his section is for Food stamps, SNAP/TANF.
What is the purpose for round trip mileage for dependent care?
Court ordered child support needs more space and sporadic support notation has no available field.
Best description of Rent type has a box for- Homeless. Replace Homeless with Owned home. Public housing should include type of house and conditions.  The Utilities is already asked for in section 14. Add cell phone to telephone box.
Section 14 – ask for Receipts as payment documents.
Section 15- has smorgasbord of questions for food stamps, workforce enforcement, fleeing felons, veterans, tribal TANF.  Reassign to the self-contained sections that we are recommending after you define purpose and need of these questions.
Section 16 –Signatures.
Reword, redefine, have paralegals not attorneys review this section with those who have knowledge of Indian law. HSD is given ample authority on release of information, ‘proof of things’, limited authority to send applicant information to unknown agencies, payback to HSD for unauthorized benefits, explanation of benefits in native language is never done, Estate Recovery (Federal laws protections in place for residents living on federal lands), assignment of all rights to HSD with no explanations.  
After going through this confusing application the last statement states ‘to withdraw your application for any program, initial the box of the program and it give the applicant a list including NMHIX.  All Native applicants can ‘opt in’ nor are they mandatorily required to enroll.
Recommend assign signatures to each self-contained section.
Section 17- states ‘we will help you fill out a voter registration application’ at ISD.  Is there someone at these offices to assist?  Recommend a box to be check off for those already registered.
Employer Coverage Form can be done by employers.  
   


Kaiser health news: Colorado Exchange "Watchdog Likes What It Sees" By Eric Whitney

KAISER HEALTH NEWS

Colorado Exchange Watchdog Likes What It Sees

Colorado lawmakers overseeing the set-up of the state’s health insurance exchange are generally pleased with how it’s going, but they are worried some residents will still be “left out in the cold,” without insurance even if the exchange works well.

Colorado is one of 16 states and the District of Columbia that chose to set up its own exchange, via a bipartisan bill the state passed in 2011. Republicans agreed to vote for it only if it included a special legislative oversight committee that would allow a majority to block exchange funding requests.
That hasn’t happened yet, but oversight committee hearings have been testy in the past. Not so last Thursday, the final hearing before the exchange’s opening day October 1. It was remarkable for the praise members from both parties heaped upon exchange leadership.

Creating an exchange “was not something I was convinced was the right thing to do,” said Republican Rep. Bob Gardner, who voted against the exchange bill, “but (I) have become convinced.”

He said he has been impressed with exchange leaders, and observed, at the hearing’s end, that the exchange “is on a road to success.”

for the rest of the article:
http://capsules.kaiserhealthnews.org/index.php/2013/09/colorado-exchange-watchdog-likes-what-it-sees/

NM HIX Stakeholder Listening Session



New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange
Stakeholders Listening Session
Thursday, September 19, 2013
2:00 pm – 5:00 pm
Hotel Encanto
705 S. Telshor Blvd
Guadalupe/Soledad Room
Las Cruces, NM
(575) 532-4277

Light refreshment served

Open to all interested parties. Stakeholders include consumers, consumer
advocates, medical providers, small employers, health insurance agents, and
you!
Questions? Contact Leah Steimel, Outreach Director
(505) 819-1426 or
lsteimel@nmhix.com