State Seeks Delay in Medicaid Changes
In a May 29 letter to the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, HSD said its failure to notify Indian health care providers
in writing 60 days before submitting its application “raised a concern on the
part of (CMS).” HSD said it sent written notification to the providers on May
22. HSD spokesman Matt Kennicott told the Journal the department would probably
resubmit its application in late July or early August and would use the time to
solicit more public comment on its plan.
Kennicott said the notification problem was a
“bureaucratic technicality.”
“Their glitch is a major issue for us,” said Gary
Tenorio of Kewa Pueblo Health Corp. “In the beginning there was a lack of
consultation and communication between the state and the tribes. In their
initial send-out they said they had meetings with the tribes, pueblos and
nations. It hasn’t been that.”
The Human Services Department started its Medicaid
redesign effort more than a year ago. HSD Secretary Sidonie Squier told the
Journal in February that HSD hopes to slow the growth in Medicaid spending over
five years by between $140 million and $205 million from the program through a
combination of administrative streamlining, quality-of-care improvements, and
changes in Medicaid recipients’ behaviors and emergency room
use.
HSD got the first public reaction to its application
last month at its Medicaid Advisory Committee meeting. Health care providers and
advocates for Medicaid consumers raised a number of concerns. Several said that
while the HSD concept sounded good, it was not clear how its ideas could be or
would be implemented and at what cost to consumers and providers of health
care.
Quela Robinson, a staff attorney with the
New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, said health care providers and Medicaid
consumers saw the state’s application only after it was sent to CMS and that
public comment HSD used to craft a Medicaid reform concept paper was limited to
a handful of three- and four-hour meetings last summer held in the middle of
workdays around the state.
“Now that they are finally responding to criticism about
not being transparent and finally holding public meetings, the question is
whether HSD will really listen to what the public has to say,” Robinson said,
referring to HSD’s request for a delay. “In the past (the department) has merely
informed people about final decisions. This is not good
governance.”
In its letter to CMS, HSD says it “engaged in
wide-ranging and open dialogue with all of our stakeholders in New Mexico
throughout the almost full year we took to design the
program.”
Anthony Yepa, a Kewa Pueblo Health Corp. analyst, said
that “there are some very good things” in the state’s proposal but that the plan
doesn’t adequately take into account a host of “federal laws that dictate and
prescribe how health care in native communities should be implemented and
carried out.”
— This article appeared on page C1 of the Albuquerque Journal
— This article appeared on page C1 of the Albuquerque Journal
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5054 - Release Date: 06/07/12
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5054 - Release Date: 06/07/12
No comments:
Post a Comment