Tuesday, May 14, 2013

The Next Executive Board Meeting of the NM HIX


 
Notice is hereby given of the next Board meeting of the New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange

Will be held on May 16, 2013 from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM and on May 17, 2013 from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. the meeting will be held at CNM Workforce Training Center, Meeting Room 103.

5600 Eagle Rock Ave. NE
Albuquerque, NM 87113.

This meeting is being called pursuant to the Open Meetings Act Resolution NMSA 1978, Ch. 10, Art.15. If an individual with a disability is in need of a reader, amplifier, qualified sign language interpreter, or any other form of auxiliary aid or service to attend or participate in the hearing or meeting, please contact NM Health Insurance Alliance office at 1-800-204-4700, prior to the meeting

I encourage Tribal health programs to send a representative to this meeting

ABQ Journal Article 'Health Exchange Faces Challenges"

Health exchange faces challenges






Three reporters, including this one, attended the inaugural New Mexico health insurance exchange board meeting this month. We were looking for fireworks. There weren’t any.
To be candid, there was some thought that board members J. Deane Waldman, a pediatric cardiologist at the University of New Mexico, and Human Services Secretary Sidonie Squier might launch some sort of a tempest by saying things at the meeting that they’ve said elsewhere. They didn’t, and the meeting proceeded with tedious decorum.
Waldman has written that the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, establishes death panels. This is that ridiculous claim, most famously advanced by Sarah Palin, that says government-sponsored efforts to determine what medical procedures actually work and that, therefore, ought to be paid for will lead to government-sponsored withholding of health care that, in turn, will kill patients the government somehow deems unworthy to save.
Since government and private insurers already ration health care by establishing payment rates for all medical procedures based on no particular understanding of what works or is cost-effective; since about half of all tests performed by physicians are either unnecessary or inconclusive; since 30 percent of every health care dollar is lost to waste; since there are only about 20 diseases for which there has been developed well-understood, evidence-based, nationally accepted standards of care; since all the other diseases are treated in any number of ways, some successfully, some not; since it might be nice if someone could let providers know which approaches to those diseases really do work; since health care is now consuming about 17 percent of the nation’s economic output with no end in sight; and since every insurance company and every health system of any size, from UNM Health Sciences Center to the Cleveland Clinic, is trying to get medical providers to stop doing things that don’t work so they can shift spending to things that do work, the death panel charge remains what it always was: nonsense.
Squier has made it clear in many nonpublic meetings with many staff members, people from other agencies, businesspeople, medical people and political people that she loathes Obamacare, which she has characterized as socialism.
I always get a kick out of that. The major achievement of the Affordable Care Act is to force millions of people to purchase insurance from private companies, which then will pay hundreds of thousands of private businesses, including drugstores, hospitals and doctors, for the care they deliver. How increasing the market opportunities of for-profit businesses is socialism is beyond me.
There is much wrong with Obamacare, but it contains no death panels and is not socialism.
In any case, the words “death panel” and “socialism” were not heard at the board meeting.
The board was authorized in the last legislative session to oversee development of a state health insurance exchange. The governor appointed Waldman to the board. The Human Services secretary is a board member by statute.
The exchange is supposed to be something like an Amazon or Expedia for health insurance. Consumers are supposed to be able to go to a website starting in October, find an insurance policy that works for them, and with the click of a mouse button buy the product. The system is supposed to determine in real time whether the consumer is qualified for Medicaid or other public support.
I was a product manager in the computer industry for years, and believe me when I say this is one dreadfully complicated bit of software that almost certainly will not be ready for prime time by October.
The progress toward building an exchange has been oddly sporadic. Dan Derksen was loaned to HSD by UNM to secure federal money and develop plans for an exchange only to be forced out when he was ready to start implementation. Legislation to establish the exchange was vetoed in one session, signed in another. The effort was interrupted when HSD decided to hire former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt’s firm to guide creation of the exchange. A request for proposals to install exchange information systems was issued in February 2012. The contract still hasn’t been awarded. The governor, Legislature and attorney general wrangled for months over a governance structure for the exchange that only this month started work.
The governor’s people have insisted that while they may not like Obamacare, they will make it work in New Mexico. Appearances to the contrary, they say there has been no deliberate effort to sabotage the exchange. One is left to infer, therefore, that with five months to go and no exchange in sight we are witnessing either incompetence or a miracle in the making.
UpFront is a daily front-page news and opinion column. Comment directly to Winthrop Quigley at 823-3896 or wquigley@abqjournal.com. Go to www.abqjournal.com/letters/new to submit a letter to the editor.

Report from the HIX Executive Board meeting (Day two)

I apologize to the lateness of this report, the second day started with a closed Executive Session from 8:30 AM to 9:00 AM.

Topic covered by the executive board throughout the day included:

Outreach and education
Navigator/in-person Assister Grant funding application
Native American Service Center
Discussion of Proxy for Board members that cannot attend meetings
Development of Advisory Committees
Budget


Outreach and education:
establishment grants can be used for marketing activities, use of Radio, Television, and social media, in mobile "app" form where discussed.  An Advisory Committee will be established to make recommendations to the Executive board.

Navigator/in-person assisters:
Establishment grants cannot be used to fund salaries of Navigators, Navigators must be funded by the States.  PPACA rules say that a state-based exchange requires a Navigator program, however, CCIIO has stated that the state may have a few as two (2) Navigators in order to qualify, the assumption is that the States can use federal funding to create a larger, mostly temporary, in-person Assister program.

Native American Service Center (NASC)
the discussion concerning a NASC was similar to previous discussions what was the function, what is the budget, how many employees will it take to run, will there be navigators and ISD workers within to determine eligibility and enroll in either Medicaid or HIX.  Mr. Nunez from the HIA did present a structure chart as well as information on previously released job descriptions for the Center. Also there was mention of a Budget set aside of approximately $2.6 million.

Board Proxy
It was decided that any board member that was unable to attend a meeting could defer their vote to another board member and that vote would count.  Members would be given the option to conference call.  Only Sec Squire and Sec. Francini (DoI) can designate a representative to take their place on the board.

Advisory Committees
there are going to be three advisory committees established
Marketing and outreach
Budget
Health Plan

there will be a Native American Standing Committee chaired by Theresa Gomez that will be established.  I believe that there will be a letter out to Tribes asking to designate a representative to that committee

Budget
HIX is still waiting for a MOU to be estabilished between HSD OHCR and the HIX in order for the remainder of the original $34 million from the Level one establishment Grant and any additional funding that is being requested by the state for the development of the HIX.


The Following is commentary given on the second day by Pueblo of Jemez representative:

Native American Issues for the Health Insurance Exchange Board

  1. Crucial to define, as soon as possible, what form New Mexico’s HIX will take as this will determine state eligibility to apply for Navigator program grant funds.  State only will preclude this.  Will the “quasi-federal” relationship (at least for the first year) described as one of the options be sufficient for Navigator grant fund application?


  1. Effective outreach, education and enrollment in rural and Tribal communities will require a lot of knocking on doors – many lack internet and even reliable telephone access.


  1. With rapidly approaching deadlines to get the Exchange up and running, existing Benefits Coordinators, Community Health Representatives and Community Health Workers will bear the brunt of the education and outreach burden - out of necessity.  As it has been in the past, this looks to be an uncompensated addition to their already significant workload.


  1. Request that CCIIO respond to 3/4/13 letter from Joyce Naseyowma regarding release of some Level I Establishment grant funding already received and earmarked for activities such as Tribal Outreach/Education and Assistance to AI/AN individuals and small businesses.


  1. Feel the need to re-iterate Mr. Lujan’s comments yesterday encouraging Tribal Consultation as early as possible as the Health Insurance Exchange is guaranteed to have a significant impact on Indian Country.


Depending on issues covered in Day 2:
  1. Has planning for the Native American Service Center resumed?  If not, it is essential to get this back on track ASAP.


  1. What did the outreach and education projects in the Native American community mentioned yesterday refer to?


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Native American Technical Advisory Committee (NATAC)

Good Evening everyone,

In the recording of Julie Wienberg's answers to my question at the Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) I posted on May 4th, Ms. Wienberg mentioned the reconvening of a Native American Technical Advisory Committee within HSD, and a reconvening of a Technical Advisory Committee of the MAC.  Earlier I had emailed Theresa Belanger, the Tribal Liaison for the Medical Assistance Division, and asked her when these committees would be meeting next the following is the response from MAD.

I wrote:

Theresa,
 
Has this subcommittee been reestablished? have there been any meeting dates posted yet?
 
Erik Lujan

Ms.  Belanger responded:

Good afternoon Erik,

In response to your question below about the Native American Technical Advisory Committee( NATAC), yes it has been established and the first meeting is May 9th. Since this is the first meeting of the year and is a working session, it will not be an open meeting. The subcommittees to the Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC), which NATAC is one of, is not subject to the State’s open meeting statutes. The work product from the meeting will be posted on our website.

Thank you.

Theresa

Theresa Belanger, LBSW, MA
Native American Liaison (Chippewa)


After speaking with other Advocates it is clear that the State on NM has no real intentions of seeking input on any portion of the Waiver out side of State Employees. In the past HSD/MAD has created workgroups around portions of a Waiver but membership to these work groups is by invitation only and rarely includes consumer advocates or private providers.

These "workgroups" often advise on development, implementation, of policy then HSD may adopt or reject the recommendations of the "workgroups".  Only after this process is complete is the policy made public and open for some form of commentary, usually on a quarterly basis at the MAC meetings.

I have asked Julie Weinberg in the past that I would like to know who are on these committees, and how they are selected.  The answer I got was along the lines of we sent letters out to Tribal organizations ( AIPC, NIHB, AAIHS, Northern and Southern Pueblos organizations Navajo Nation, Mescalero and Jicarria Apache) and those who responded make up the committees.

I would like Tribal Health Programs to look into asking tribal leaders to nominate members of Tribal Health Boards, Clinics, and or councilmen to these committees. This will go along way to help ensure that Tribes are not left in the Dark.

ADDITION:

I just received a copy of the NATAC meeting for May 9th (tomorrow)

 
Native American Technical Advisory Committee
a sub-committee to the NM Medicaid Advisory Committee
Meeting #1   
May 9, 2013
 
Agenda

  1. Welcome
  1. Introductions
  1. Discuss Native American Technical Advisory Committee (NATAC) Purpose:
    1. Advise the Medicaid Director and NM Human Services Department on key issues affecting Native American Medicaid beneficiaries and Indian Health Services, Tribal 638 facility and Urban Indian health providers (I/T/Us) during the readiness period, implementation period and ongoing operations of Centennial Care.
  1. Discuss Key  issues for the NATAC to address for Centennial Care readiness
    1. Member communication and education about Centennial Care
    2. MCO training for I/T/Us
  1. Create Workgroups for Making Recommendations
    1. Member communication and education workgroup
    2. I/T/U readiness workgroup
  1. Other Business


  1. Set Next Meeting Date

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Audio Q&A comments from MAC regarding Tribal Consultation


Good Evening everyone, I am trying some thing new to this blog, thanks to some assistance from friends I will be posting sound bites for past and future meeting that I attend. the following sound bite is from the last Medicaid Advisory Committee meeting which is the oversight committee to Julie Weinberg Director of the Medical Assistance Division (MAD).  MAD is the state division within the Human Services Department (HSD) that administers the medical portions of the Medicaid Program, Salud, SCI, CHIP, CoLTS and Behavioral Health.

Monday, April 29, 2013

Report From the HIX Executive Board Meeting (day one)


Good Evening everyone,

At todays meeting of the HIX Executive Board there was not Native American issues discussed, except for a about 10 minutes of the budget/request for level I establishment grant funding.  I was said that about 32 million of the original 34 million in the Level I establishment grant is still in there at HSD awaiting the creation of a MOU between HSD and HIA/HIX or for HIX to become a official licensed organization. NM can apply for any additional money quarterly for the development of the HIX as long as HIX can demonstrate the need for the additional Level 1 establishment grant funding.  So there is the May 15 Deadline for funding, but there will also be another opportunity to apply for more funding by August 15. 

The funding for the NASC is still in the budget and will be discussed at tomorrows meeting. 

Theresa Gomez our only NA Board member asked me to give her some idea of what we want in the NASC. I will give an Idea of what I would like to see and I invite everyone in the group to comment as well, please try to reply by 10AM tomorrow (April 30th) we are not sure exactly when the NASC or the creation of the NA Advisory board will be heard.

The NASC should:

  • Include the 1.3 million that was set aside in the original Level one establishment grant.
  • Have a Director, Liaison and three Navigators preferable fluent in at least one Native Language.
  • Be a resource for Tribal Programs first, to educate/Train Tribal programs (CHR Benefits Coordinators, Senior Centers...)  how to operate as navigators/in-person assisters, or provide training to help Certify as navigators/in-person assisters, and instruct Tribal programs how to be reimbursed for providing Navigator/in-person assister Services.
  • Help Tribal programs with issues of eligibility, health plan information, and program regulations.
  • Be able to determine eligibility of NA individuals on a walk in basis for either Medicaid or HIX.
  • Report to NA Advisory Board on  a quarterly basis.

The NA Advisory board should maintain as many of the Native American Work Group under the HIX Task force as possible to maintain continuity, but Navajo Nation Jicarilla and Mescalero as well as Northern and Southern Pueblos should be encourage to nominate a member as well to the Advisory board.  I imagine 11- 13 individuals in this Advisory board.


I also want to mention that one of the presenters, a man from Massachusetts, outlined the time table, scope of work and budget for creating that states exchange. 
  • $25million and 60 employees to operate
  • 14 months to complete and it s scope was less than what we envision for NM. meaning no SHOP component.
  • he didn't think that we could have the Exchange that we want up and running earlier that Oct 2014.
Now on the other hand NM has done a lot of work previous to the actual creation of the exchange though the Health Insurance Alliance, Department of Insurance, and the Task Force effort, we are ahead of Massachusetts was when they started developing their exchange.
Please comment if I left anything out.

Erik Lujan
Volunteer Advocate/Policy Analyst
NMICoA Health Committee

Friday, April 26, 2013

CMS releases Q&A for Medicaid

The following is a press release from CMS regarding FAQ on the ACA.


CMCS Informational Bulletin 

DATE:  April 25, 2013  
FROM:  Cindy Mann, Director  Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services  
SUBJECT:  Affordable Care Act Questions and Answers  
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is pleased to announce the release of important information for states on the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.  
Today we issued the next in a series of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) to address Affordable Care Act implementation questions.  These FAQs address three main topics: availability of the 75 percent federal match for maintenance and operations, systems issues regarding communication between the Federally-Facilitated Marketplace and Medicaid, and further policy guidance regarding the use of section 1115 demonstrations.  
The FAQs may be accessed at: http://www.medicaid.gov/State-Resource-Center/FAQ-Medicaid- and-CHIP-Affordable-Care-Act-ACA-Implementation/FAQ-Medicaid-and-CHIP-Affordable- Care-Act-ACA-Implementation.html 
If you have additional questions, please send them to CMCSPPACAQuestions@cms.hhs.gov