Tribal Consultation
New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD)
March 20, 2012
Indian Pueblo Cultural Center
The Pueblo of Jemez opposes the NM Medicaid modernization
plans as detailed in the Centennial Care
concept paper, issued February 21, 2012.
The Centennial Care concept paper is presented under the
guise of “ensuring care of New Mexicans for the next 100 years, but its
resultant product is to reduce costs by limiting medical services and care
coordination to all New Mexicans. Specific to Native Americans, those same
limitations are imposed, along with a direct threat by the state to tribal
sovereignty and authority. This assessment is based on the following:
1. Threat
to Tribal Sovereignty and Authority
PART I: P.L. 93-638 law authorizes tribal nations to contract their
shares of health care funds that would have been spent by the IHS on their
individual tribal membership. This law authorizes individual tribal nations to
then determine and design the best health care system for that tribal
population. Most tribes use a series of surveys, health data and expenditure
analysis, prevalence data and a number of other health measures to determine
the shape and scope of their tribal health system, for which the tribe then
conducts financial planning. A part of that financial planning includes 3rd
party revenue collection.
NM HSD’s Centennial Care concept
paper poses a direct threat to the intent of PL 93-638 and tribal sovereignty in
the following ways:
·
The State describes a fully MCO run Medicaid
system for the state. Although there is a recommendation in the Native
Americans section that the MCOs selected by the state be required “to contract with the IHS and or 638 clinics
as part of their network…” (27), there is no indication as to the timeframe
or the scope of the relationship. Thus, there is no confidence that the tribal
health clinics will immediately be made an integral part of the health care of
our Medicaid eligible tribal members.
·
The Centennial Care paper indicates that when a
Medicaid eligible individual applies for Medicaid, he/she must select a health
plan (MCO). This means that the individual automatically goes into the MCO
“system” because fee for service, which is the practice utilized by tribal
health clinics, will no longer be an option.
·
The MCO’s will stratify our Medicaid eligible
population and conduct care coordination through the MCO’s designated system.
Following the state’s plan, our patients, in the interim while the MCO is
attempting to develop effective tribal contracts and coordination, will be
taken out of our tribal system.
·
The Centennial Care paper describes the state’s
intent to eliminate the “opt-out” provision for tribes, similar to what has
occurred with other MCO’s in the state (CoLTS). Under this scenario, the tribe cannot
proceed with its own determined care coordination on behalf of the patient, but
must stick with the MCO directed care.
PART II: In 2000, the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act was amended to include Public Law 106–417, also called the
‘‘Alaska Native and American Indian Direct Reimbursement Act of 2000’’. This
act allows for direct billing of
medicare, medicaid, and other third party payors, and to expand the eligibility
under such program to tribes and tribal organizations. The ACA of 2010
contained the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA),
not only confirming, but also expanding tribal authority to plan and design
tribal health systems and to direct bill CMS for reimbursement.
·
Under the state plan, the selected MCO’s will
stratify our Medicaid eligible population and conduct care coordination from
there through the MCO’s designated system.
·
Based
on the description, it is a very real concern that Indian health programs could
find themselves without an ability to collect from any source for services
rendered at tribal health clinics for Medicaid eligible patients.
·
This
would leave the Indian health programs with not only a loss of potential new
revenues, but also an actual reduction in revenues from prior levels (where
such claims had previously been paid by Medicaid).
·
Medicaid
makes up approximately 70% of our annual 3rd party revenue.
·
The
Pueblo of Jemez uses Medicaid as a 3rd party resource to supplement
the cost of care for our patients through our tribally designed health system.
·
The
loss or reduction of this significant resource would negatively affect our
tribal health care delivery system either by preventing us from maintaining
current service level, which is partially supported by Medicaid reimbursements,
or by preventing us from expanding our billable service delivery.
·
Such
an outcome would be directly counter to the Congressional intent in enacting
IHCIA and Public Law 106–417: Alaska Native and American Indian Direct
Reimbursement Act of 2000 (Exhibit A).
·
Even
if a tribe were immediately brought into the MCO via contract, it has been the
experience of tribes working with MCO’s in the state that new MCO’s do not pay
in a timely manner in the general in the first year of business.
·
The
state’s plans for a “proliferation of
patient centered medical and health homes” (pg. 14) would bring tribes into
the care coordination system, but are considered long range plans. The
Centennial Paper describes the MCO’s as being initially responsible for basic
care coordination and health homes being developed over the next several years.
2.
The
state’s plan is culturally inappropriate to the Native American population of
this state.
·
Tribal health clinics already offer a “health
home” to our tribal members.
·
Under the state model, care coordination would
begin through an initial phone interview with an MCO employee. This is
concerning primarily because technology assessment of the state indicate that
the population with the least amount of telephone access are rural New
Mexicans, specifically Native Americans.
·
Clients will go through a “stratification of
risk”, which the Centennial Care paper indicates will be based on “evidence based,
best practices”. Tribal data concerning standards of care and improved health
outcomes are not included as part of the MCO consideration, though they are
part of the tribe’s consideration for care coordination.
·
Further,
the state’s plan indicates that after the initial phone interview, the
client will then be assigned a “risk group care coordinator” who will complete
a comprehensive assessment. Based on the description of the need to interview
family members and care givers, this interview will require a face to face
visit.
·
Many of our tribal communities use English as a
second language. Communicating health concerns, discussing medical terminology,
diagnosis, treatments plans and family dynamics is most effectively done by our tribal clinic based benefits
coordinators, not the MCO.
·
This
is an area that current MCOs have struggled with and which will simply not be attainable
under the proposed MCO run Medicaid model.
·
In
fact, our tribal benefits coordinators are providing the intensive care
coordination for the existing MCOs in the state for our tribal members.
·
Finally,
at the point the MCOs shift the care coordination responsibility to the health
home site, the Centennial Care paper does not indicate if and how the
MCOs will be required to properly reimburse the tribes for that care
coordination service. It appears that moving forward, as it occurs with current
MCO relationships, the percentage of the capitation rate that the MCO’s receive
for care coordination will not be passed on the entity actually conducting that
coordination.
3.
The
Pueblo of Jemez offers both State and Tribal remedies:
·
State Remedies
i.
Mini-Grants: The Centennial Care paper describes
that the state will establish two pilot site projects. One is to develop health
homes in pilot sites in Albuquerque, and the other is related to developing
bundled rates for hospital stays. This urban location of the first pilot project
is out of touch with NM, which is primarily rural.
By the January 2014, the Pueblo of Jemez, like many other tribal
health centers will have its own provider network, operating very much along
the same lines as a managed care entity.
Therefore, the Pueblo of Jemez
proposes that the state issue mini-grants to tribal health entities to
establish tribal health homes as pilot sites in the first year of this
modernization effort. The tribal health homes would fully participate as partners
in the state’s plans for Medicaid modernization, including:
1.
Tribal sites will receive IT infrastructure on
par with the other pilot sites for access to such things as the Medicaid
Management Information System, which the state pays for existing MCOs;
2.
Tribal sites will have access to the
consolidated credential and re-credentialing processes;
3.
Tribal sites will have access to (if desired)
the state’s contract Third Party Administrator;
4.
Tribal sites will direct bill for Medicaid.
ii.
The state must retain the “opt out” provision
for tribes for all state- MCO relationships.
These first two remedies to
alleviate many concerns related to tribal sovereignty, protect direct
reimbursements to tribes and ensure culturally appropriate health care
delivery.
iii.
Tribal Participation must be required in the
development of the RFP’s for the MCO’s and on the selection committee of the
MCO’s.
iv.
Tribal Subject Matter Experts (SME) must participate
in selection or evaluation of proposed evidence based, best practices
identified as applicable to Native American populations.
v.
There
must be equitable tribal representation on the governing board that will
provide direction and oversight to the state’s Modernized Medicaid system.
·
Tribal Remedy
i.
CMS Tribal Consultation (Exhibit B): Unlike any
other population in the State of New Mexico, tribes have the option to work
directly with CMS. Specifically, under the CMS Tribal Consultation Policy,
signed into effect in November 2011: “…consultation
must occur on an ongoing basis so that Indian Tribes have an opportunity to
provide meaningful and timely input on issues that may have a substantial
direct effect on Indian Tribes.” (page 3) If the State of New Mexico
continues, as planned to seek CMS authorization and waivers to implement its
Medicaid Modernization as described in the Centennial Care document, the tribes
are within their authority to dispute the matter directly to CMS; tribes may
request that CMS facilitate mediation between the tribes and the state, and
deny any waiver request from the state that diminishes tribal sovereignty or
attempts to limit federal law.
ii.
WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO?
No comments:
Post a Comment